You demonstrated ZERO ability to control ANYTHING about the Internet. Just about the only Brits who have done anything are the Rolling Stones, who pay to have some jerky nerd with a "bot" snoop and sniff at blogs and file DMCA's against anything and everything that might bring Jagger a copper coin. That includes filing against a certain Mr. Ill Follks for offering a parody from the Harvard Lampoon about the Rolling Stones that didn't even use Rolling Stones music!
Now David Cameron is supposedly going to do something about online porn. What a joke. First order of business is to be a Nazi and make everyone in Great Britain announce if they are for or against pornography! What an insane invasion of privacy, making people "declare whether they want to maintain access to online pornography." It reminds me of the American witch hunts where citizens had to declare if they were members of the Communist party, ever, and if they would swear a loyalty oath.
If you believe in free speech, or privacy, and refuse to answer the question at all, what happens, David?
Cameron has no understanding of how Hans and Christer and Zinhof and any other porn-loving weasel can use anonymous proxies. Or how porn fans flock to private forums for their dirty work. True, David? DO you know how easy it is to find torrent sites where piss and rape and bondage and animal games and most every other type of video is given away free? Most of these places don't bother with child porn, because it's creepy and not nearly as popular as YOU think it is. It's easy for minors to get to these sites. It's also easy to just use EBAY, and your ISP's aren't going to ban anyone from going there! There's a secret "adults only" section on eBay, ya know.
You're using the buzz word of child porn? That's the ONLY problem, adults watching a 12 year-old? What about the reverse? You think that a 12 year-old should surf the Net and by Googling, or typing in a suggestive URL, see Hans and Christer dressed up in leather and drag and taking turns pissing on each other and buggering each other to Beach Boys and Jethro Tull music?
Do you also think there's nothing more disturbing than the site of a naked child? You can find those in a museum. In a nudist magazine. But what about "rotten" websites that revel in photos of murder victims? How sick is that? How about the sites that teach you to make a bomb, the kind that killed a child in Boston? Where do YOU draw the line, David, on what is offensive?
Kid porn, David? 13 year-olds are having sex in YOUR SCHOOLS RIGHT NOW. Unwed mothers are younger than ever, asshole. What are you doing about 15 year-old baby-making chavs, asshole? Tell me, asshole, I really want to know. Are you blaming the INTERNET every time another unwanted dollop comes flopping out of a 15 year old's cunt in Hull? Or out of a 16 year-old's hull in Cunt? Or Kent? You CAN'T have an answer for that, you cunt!
What, Mr. Cameron, makes you think you're accomplishing anything at all by installing "filters" for porn? People can do that NOW if they want to. There are "nanny" programs for blue-nosed idiots who don't want to see porn. These can be defeated by the idiots' porn-loving retarded children, of course, but yes, "decent" people can use "filters" right now! PS, how about filters so we don't have to see anything about Kate Middleton or Kim Kardashian?
Lastly, Cammy, little David Camisole, what the FUCK are YOU doing about EBAY and their hidden "adult" section where the weirdest porn is easily available, and the "public" section where guys like Mark, the "dirtyboyz-uk" seller from Burnham-on-Sea in Somerset was offering "Euro Boy" adults only porn where anyone and everyone could see it?
What the FUCK are YOU doing about GOOGLE, where their Blogger/Blogspot boys have blogs loaded up with porn and all you do is click "I'm over 21" and you get in, and get to download all the pirated filth you want…so that Google, the blogger, and Freakshare or Rapidgator or whoever can also make a profit.
You're really going to have "all the ISP's…rewired…" Mr. Big Brother? And YOU are going to determine what actually IS pornography? How about the book "Lolita?" That's about an underage slut. You'll ban that? What about the latest songs from the rappers who sulk and spit and squat about the stage like constipated monkeys? What about your Islamic immigrants who don't like poofters and will even jail or stone a woman if she has a sexual relationship without being locked into marriage…you think they will restrain their Jihad rage at your decadent country? And how about the tabloids that routinely run nudie photos? Ya know, the Internet is nasty but so is the real world!
Maybe, David Cameron, you should crack down on that crack under your nose…because what you say has a corroding influence on your country. And maybe you should stop giving obscene raises to MP's and political hacks and small town cruds who make life hell for the poor people and overtaxed and the middle class. What's your definition of obscenity and why doesn't it include rich politicians and bureaucrats getting richer while they make life difficult for honest and decent Brits who want jobs at a fair wage? Porn? For Fucks Sake…nobody wants to listen to drool from you, you dick head.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.