Monday, June 20, 2016

Wacko Jackoff

Oh, this is a surprise?

One of the steal-alike "news" websites, Radar Online (as opposed to Rat-out Online, Rat-off Online, Rat Feed, Rat Buzz, Rattington Post, London Daily Rat, Gawking at Radar, Deciderat) found out Wacko Jacko had a porn stash.

Let's all have a big sigh of...SO?

The maniac is DEAD, remember?

Let's also remember that all this shit did NOTHING to dissuade a court from finding Wacko Jackoff NOT GUILTY.

At the time, there was more than enough bizarre testimony about Jackson. One tidbit? He kept tampons which he liked to insert up his ass. He offered them to his little friends, along with his "Jesus Juice" wine, and his collection of porn magazines.

According to this news item...

"These materials include 'a book depicting nude children' found in the singer's 'arcade room'; 'a book which contained nude photographs of men' in the 'master bathroom'; and multiple books found in the 'master bedroom' that included one with 'naked and semi-naked gay men' and another with 'pre-teen or early teenage individuals' who in some cases were 'nude or semi-nude.'

Wacko was only on trial for seducing some kid. Not for owning pix of nude males. Also, the nude male pix he had were apparently all in books and magazines that were PUBLISHED, not downloads from dodgy websites. There's a difference between art studies of male nudes and kiddie porn.

Take that Gloeden shit. Guess who sells it all the time? EBAY.

We're not talking about the under-the-counter pedo stuff that was pretty rare even in Times Square, or the creepy shit available to Pete Townshend online. Gloeden's excuse was he was an artistic photographer.

There used to be three fuckhead sellers (the same person of course, who I think was in Estonia) offering those faggy full frontals of peasant-boys (Italian or Greek) hugging each other or just standing around in effeminate poses with their weiners hanging out. emk8311 was one alias, and it took a LOT to get all of them suspended. EBAY kept giving 'em chance after chance after chance. Re-up re-up re-up. The fact that it was obviously the SAME person getting TRIPLE the chances didn't seem to bother the nitwits whose job is to answer the phone and ignore complaints.

PS, the full frontals are gone, and sellers know better than to post more (word gets around). BUT you can still find the softcore poses on EBAY right NOW. Yes, shots of the naked boys from the rear are supposedly ok, as well as ones where these tweens are sporting a fig leaf. There are people selling books that include the full frontals, and EBAY does nothing about THOSE.

The question is whether a court of law would consider this stuff as kiddie porn. Maybe not. Maybe it's ART. After all, if these were drawings or paintings, there's no question they'd have "artistic merit."

PS, on the hetero side, there's an underage photograph model named Ionesco, and her pix are often for sale on Ebay, and it's hit-or-miss when they're reported and stopped. Many sellers simply mention her name WITHOUT showing an incriminating photo, heh heh. Now back to Wacko.

So all this shit dredged up by a hack website like Radar Online, so long after Wacko jacked off to the great unknown, is a bit ridiculous. So he had photographs of "naked men." Or even pre-teens. He could've owned nudist magazines, too, which technically aren't exactly porn.

They blew it (ahem) back when Jacko was declared innocent. They disregarded what the kid said, they disregarded (or didn't allow) testimony from other kids, and lawyers did a fine job of presenting Wacko as just a Peter Pan who enjoyed having kids around because he identified with them.

Wacko's fans will STILL not consider him to be evil (just like there was no malice or immorality in the way he stole McCartney's music catalog...it was just, tee hee, a little prank).

If we're talking about the stupid Gloeden photos, then this IS an expedition to nowhere. And if there was more stuff that somehow didn't get admitted into evidence, and is truly vile...like the supposed photos involving gore that nobody seems to want to show us...well, he IS still DEAD.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.