Copyright is 100% Copy Wrong (except for a Basket Case)

Here's Happy Basket Case, the privileged primping princess. The flat-chested ant eater and part-time "young Joan," is threatening to cover NEW SONGS.

Happily, if she does, and she up-chucks them to GooTube, she can keep ALL the "monetization" money. That is, if she reaches whatever the minimum is (like 1,000 or 5,000 hits. Ha ha). 

A lamebrain bitch uses somebody's music (and not even with permission) and she's ok. She gets 100% of the profits.

If you make an elaborate music video (100% of the visuals being original) GooTube says, "The music isn't yours. So we will give 100% of the royalties to the music owner. You get NOTHING for your hard work." 

What if you created a home movie of the ten minutes you spent in Grimsby before you fled for your life? If you add five seconds of John singing "You better run for your life if you can," whoops, you lose 100% of your royalties. Less than 1% of the video has MacLen product but they still get 100% of the royalties. 

Interesting, isn't it? An organist went to court, pointing out he wrote 30% of a hit song. The judge said, right, you now get 30% of the royalties.  If the Great God Google was the judge, he would've been told FUCK and OFF.   

GooTube is too big to bother with percentages. You can't file an appeal and say, "Look, I only used FIVE SECONDS of copyrighted music on my 10 minute video, can at least get HALF the fucking monetization money?" NO!

Here's what you get from GooTube:

Yes, Basket Case can cover a song and GooTube won't demand she register what she did with the publisher, and create an account with them and send them royalty statements. 

Yet anyone using an actual recording automatically forfeits ALL royalties. NO SPLIT.

With big corporations controlling the Internet, who said life is fair?