Hulk Hogan's DICK : GAWK ON IT, INTERNET SCUM

Just about the only way I'd ever cheer an idiot like Hulk Hogan is...when he enters a courtroom to smackdown a website full of fuckheads.

But since I wouldn't bother to go to court just for that, I lazily shout, "Good Lulk, Huck!"

That'll do, pig. That'll do.

GAWKER is one of those Yuppie-Hipster-Dipster websites that sprouted up like sores on a herpes whore's maw.

Whatever the stupid name...GAWKER, THEDECIDR, THE YAPPER, THE PEREZ HILTON, THE HUFFINGTON MUFFINGTON, the game's the same: steal news items.

Run the same shit as the Daily Fail or NY Post, but season it with your own personal slime. And call it JOURNALISM instead of glorified blogging.

If you care to spend some money, buy a photo or pap smear off a paparotten photographer. Or (and here's where GAWKER got into trouble) invade someone's privacy for a big laugh. Har har har. Run screenshots of a porn video a celebrity made. Or in this case, may not even have been aware of. It seems Hogan didn't even know there was a camcorder rigged up in the bedroom. It wasn't his bedroom, after all.

According to the somewhat sympathetic New York Post, "Gawker has countered that it’s protected not only by the First Amendment but by Hogan’s status as a public person."

That's a lot of shit.

It's nobody's business what goes on in somebody's bedroom. You want to defend wiretapping next? "Hey, I got all this great shit Angie and Brad said to each other. I put a microphone under their bed. That's legal because they're celebrities! Oh yeah. First amendment, too! Rah rah!"

If Hogan fucked a bimbo in public, yes. That's news and it's on public property.

You can pretty much hector and pester anyone in public, and follow them down the street. At one time, you couldn't. Professional asshole Ron Gallela was ordered to stay the fuck away from Jackie Kennedy and NOT get in her face. But since then, rules have gotten lax. But not THIS lax.

There's just no justification for this kind of invasion of privacy. What's next, breaking and entering and stealing someone's mail and printing it?

Guys have gone to jail for hacking the computers of actresses and giving everyone copies of their private photos.

IF I'M BEING HONEST, I do understand Gawker's desperation defense. They're probably looking at the cases of Pam Anderson and the late great Mindy McCready. Pam's dirty home videos were STOLEN, and yet somehow, a judge ruled that the company who bought the stolen goods could keep right on selling that shit. But is it possible Pam just had an idiot for a lawyer? Or that she was given a cut of the profits? That's what McCready did. She decided it would be good publicity, and she not only settled with the porn company, but provided a fresh interview (but not a fresh fuck and suck session) to go with the release.

HOWEVER, Gawker is not selling porn tapes. Their aim was to gain fame and notoriety by offering a scoop that humiliated a celebrity, and did so via blatant (so it would seem) invasion of privacy.

If I was Gawker I'd do what so many scumbag "publishers" have done...hide the assets, sell off as much as possible, put shit in storage, and declare bankruptcy. Then come back a month later with a new name, like Pawker. Or Stawker. And be punks all over again.