"Not that there's anything wrong with that," to use the tart catch-phrase about fags on the old "Seinfeld" show.
LORD knows, and SAM SMITH knows, being GAY is just peachy. Everyone should be gay. It'll cut down on the population.
IF I'M BEING HONEST, this latest outrage isn't surprising. DC Comics, Warners and the rest of the bloodsuckers, have done everything possible with these two comic book heroes.
If you f ollow the trajectory it's gone from unbelievable to believable to bullshit to faggotry. In the 40's, a movie serial featured Kirk Allyn as Superman, looking pretty much like the comic book (with the curl on the forehead that always seemed horrid). There was an animation effect for his flying which could've been worse. The serial version of Batman was just inept. Holding up better is the bunch of Superman cartoons from Fleischer Studios (home of Popeye).
By the TV age, "Baby Boomers" saw the surprisingly low-budget (didn't ANYONE care) "Superman" series with no special effects and no super villains. What it had, was believable, likable George Reeves. If you come from another planet and this gives you x-ray and heat vision, the ability to fly, the strength to KO people with one punch) why do you need to look like a muscleman? Reeves didn't. He projected "the American way," which was honesty, decency and respect for all.
About 7 years later, campy 60's TV gave us Batman via Adam West, who played it straight (or just on the edge of self-parody). Some loved it, some hated it. It was unique.
After that? Superman and Batman movies offered us bloodless, banal, boring "adventures." Christopher Reeve was wooden (and would become worse, sad to say). Batman, the "Dark Knight" as he was now called, got the Psych 101 treatment as he gloomily sulked around Gotham City with his wonky lips and limited skills in brain and brawn. Oh yeah, and George Clooney wore a body suit with nipples on it. Wonder if he does that with his wife Anal.
And now? With nothing better to do, Superman and Batman will fight each other. That's hardly a fair fight given that one is super and the other is just a guy, but I trust DC/Warners to play revisionist games to even this match. Didn't the comic book suddenly declare Superman had limited powers and was no longer crippled by kryptonite? Who...the fuck...cares.
At this point in the over-heated, climate-fucked Muslim dominated 21st Century, it's fags, fags and MORE fags. What's it mean, that guys have to look to other guys for protection, since only Muslim women are capable of fighting?
All we ever hear about is FAGS. The white males are wimping out. There's athletic Bruce Jenner becoming a woman. There's Sam Smith and his wan, needy, "pity me," whining. The papers always have a confession from "a sports figure who just came out, and he's the fag-of-the-day."
DC Comics even queered The Green Lantern (green a favorite color) in the comic books, since nobody was reading it anyway. Masculinity is on the decline except among Jihadists. And now we have two faggy super heroes locked in homoerotic combat, and we all know from pro wrestling what THAT is all about.
Men in tights...not very masculine. Men wearing their panties over their tights...even LESS masculine. Batman, via the much-loathed Ben Affleck, is the "butch" one with the stubble. Superman the geek from another planet, has the typical cocksucker lips and the nerdy hairstyle. And...I can't say any of this shit has mattered to me anyway. Go be fags, guyyyyysss. Latent homos are the audience anyway. Girls don't watch this shit. It's guyyyssss who like to see guyyyyyssss in tights, with bulging crotches and big chests and all the rest of it.
Might as well just call it Batman and Superman...Engaged.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.