If you don't know they're "Famous," the reaction is often: "WHO ARE THESE VERY ORDINARY, STUPID-LOOKING GITS AND BINTS...AND WHY DOES ANYONE CARE ABOUT THEM?"
They don't carry themselves like stars. They have no dignity. They aren't even glamorous.
After an interview with a very beautiful actress, I hailed a cab for her so she could get to her next appointment. She got out, and I continued to my destination. The driver, a barely legal immigrant from some grubby country or other, instantly said, "Who was that woman? She is famous, no?"
"Yes," I said, "most people in America know who she is."
"I thought so!" the man exclaimed with delight. "She is royalty? A princess?"
"People here think so," I said, "They think that way about movie stars and TV stars."
The important thing, was that she dressed well, carried herself well, wore tasteful make-up, and just exuded class. Which is not the case with the bints who are on the cover of British tabloids...or the "celebrities" here. Like the idiot bitch Kardashians. What should a Brit or a European make of THIS picture?
WHY are they on the front page of the Daily News website? What did they do? How does this affect the price of beans? The fighting in Syria? The daily commute to work? This is a Greeting Card from the Sewer of Overpriced Monkeys.
They don't look or act like stars, either. But who are theier fans? Mongrels! Would intelligent people look up to Khloe Kardashian, a fat-faced mongoloid bitch rumored to be OJ Simpson's bastard child? Yes, whorey mama Kardashian was known to cheat, and her rich husband Robert knew it and was humiliated by it. Khloe looks nothing like her simian sisters. She's uglier.
As for the guy, aren't we ALL tired of ugly pimps making stupid finger gestures? Nigga be wearin' the shades and the chains and the ice-cream suit...we've seen it all before. He's clothing, he's not anyone who is entertaining or literate. He is a MONKEY IN A SUIT.
And who ELSE was on the front page, making "news?" More IDIOTS:
Who the FUCK is that ugly lesbian? The one with the OTHER ugly lesbian? Oh, Sara Gilbert, she's on a bad talk show run by tired, corny Sharon Fucking Osbourne? There are talk shows now where a gaggle of twats babble about fashion, and idiot housewives watch. So, Sara Gilbert is one of those? And she's a lesbian who got artificial insemination so she and her ugly partner could raise a dollop of shit all their own? Ooooh, fascinating, just FASCINATING.
Why is it everything LESBIANS do is fascinating?
WHY is it that an ugly cunt on a third-rate talk show gets the FRONT PAGE of the Daily News website for having some seminal snot blown up her twat? How does this affect ME? WHY AM I HAVING TO SEE THIS?
Next to this, a photo spread about photos in some other magazine??? Who the hell cares about the desperate attempts at beauty from Oprah a tubby woman who looks like a housemaid? I haven't watched Oprah very often...but I don't deny that she's "Earth Mother" to a lot of stupid women, and once in a while, aside from FASHION stories and make-overs, she'll sit down and do a good interview with a celebrity, politician, or some poor unfortunate who got her face eaten by a chimp. But why the FUCK do I have to watch her "rock" four silly make-up attempts? The Daily News is promoting a woman now on an obscure cable channel, who runs a dopey magazine of self-indulgence? FUCK THAT SHIT.
I can't help it if she's fat and plain. She wants to slather herself in paint, fine...why is this news? She STILL looks like OPRAH WINFREY.
There's too many dumbass ugly talentless shits on the planet, not enough real news, not enough real entertainment...and so every day we're being assaulted with witless reasons to buy lousy magazines and newspapers.
Take a step back. Alienation has its rewards...it save you time and money.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.