Didn't I predict that what the hackers did could be LIFE CHANGING for some of the people on that site? And that they didn't have the right to take the law into their own hands? And that they didn't have the fucking brains or common sense to know how they could lead some people to suicide?
Did I mention that clueless brats on power trips are destroying homes and lives whether it's giving away music or posting hacked information in a grotesque and illegal INVASION OF PRIVACY?
Always fair, I'm offering rebuttal time for Hacky McTorrentfreak. He lives in his mom's basement, has never had sex, and plays fantasy video games involving death and destruction (when he isn't masturbating to photos of Julian Assange and both the male and female versions of Manning.)
"Hello Duuuude. So people who were on the Ashley Manning site are getting divorced, being fired, having their lives turned upside down, and even killing themselves. Serves 'em right for having sex! They are cheaters, man, not like ME. If I do something illegal it's for a good cause. Anyhoo, remember, DON'T RUIN OUR FUN or you could die of a heart attack or kill yourself. "WE" have lots of ways of making your life hell, because we don't have any lives at all!"
You can be sure that thousands of people, NOT reported by the news, are getting divorced, beaten up, or killing themselves because of what the hackers did. It's a good thing the hackers don't care. One wouldn't want them to feel bad. Or discourage them in what they consider FUN.
Meanwhile, out in the real world of boobs:
Yes, a bunch of obnoxious preening cunts decided to march around topless in New York City.
See (and everybody wanted to), it's actually LEGAL to go topless.
So what's the beef?
Part of it is that men have the NERVE to stare or whistle when women do this. Women going topless should be treated with RESPECT.
Don't consider them a bunch of teasing sluts who get their kicks by calling attention to themselves.
Oh yes, and they're incensed that NYC is thinking of banning greasy wetback illegal alien whores from putting body paint on their boobs and bouncing around Times Square demanding $5 for a photo.
Somehow they fail to understand what boobs are. Which is "secondary sexual characteristics," to use a quasi-medical term. Women's tits are a prime arousal weapon. Women tend to consider their boobs "erogenous zones," especially those stiff nipples. Women's breasts look nothing like men's. But, they insist, they should breastfeed, bounce and jiggle anywhere at anytime.
The easiest way to identify a FEMALE is by CUNT and BOOBS.
The easiest way to identify a MALE is by BALLS and COCK. That's why these areas are kept covered.
There's a definition of obscenity as "appealing to prurient interest." Which is to say that when you're not thinking about sex, and somebody suddenly bounces their naked boobs at you, your attention will wander. Which could be fatal if you're driving a car. And downright obnoxious if the teasing bitch in question is NOT going to put out. Women in skimpy halter tops are bad enough.
And this would apply to a woman walking around with a hot fragrant pizza, or a platter of eclairs, grinning and saying, "Good aren't they? No, you can't touch, can't sample, and they're not for sale. Ha ha ha. I'm just doing this to drive you nuts. And if you're on a diet, I hope you suddenly run out and gorge. Or, drop dead. I don't care. Just don't RUIN MY FUN."
Something like that.
A compromise would be if sluts who LOVE to be topless simply join "Ashley Madison" or some other site and give it away FREEEEEE. Invite some of the hackers who desperately need something better to do in mom's basement.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.