Daniel Murphy's a Hero - He isn't Into Male Sex so? So Fag-getabout it

One of the annoying crackpot things about the news...is that assholes HAVE to personalize everything and reduce it to their own petty gripes and grimaces.

You've seen it a thousand times. There's an article about somebody who got killed. And a crackpot puts in the comment section: "Abortion is killing!" Or "And Obama is killing our way of life!"

The Mets won the pennant and will be in the World Series. One of the heroes was Daniel Murphy, who broke a record by hitting a home run in SIX games in a row. I'm not THAT much of a fucking Mets fan, but I swear to you, I was calling out to the TV, "Come on, hit a homer, break the record," when he came up for his last at-bat. And he did hit the home run. And I felt GOOD.

So here's a faggot who has to whine and scold in a column in the Daily News because...yeah, HE (the paper's fat, sassy, homo theatre critic) is GAY GAY GAY GAY GAY.

He's OUT OUT OUT OUT OUT. He's GAY! He's HERE AND HE'S QUEER.

And he wants to spit lemon juice all over the place because Daniel Murphy said something very mild about gays.

First off, the caption is dead wrong. "Gay New Yorkers" aren't conflicted. ONE fat homo is, who has the power to bitch and scream and stamp his feet and get an article about Murphy published.

Secondly, shouldn't straights be upset that a fag is the theater critic on the Daily News? That there's a gay clique on the media and most certainly throughout the entertainment industry?

It's a fact. A fag-ct. If a male is going to be reviewing theater, he's likely to be gay. The newspaper editor ASS-umes that gays are more literate, more sensitive, and more in tune with the very gay theater world.

BUT, straights aren't writing whining columns bemoaning the number of gays who are theater critics. They aren't crying "I can't get behind anything that reviewer writes, because that writer is GAY, 100%." Think about who is worse: Daniel, who simply said that he disapproved of the gay lifestyle, or Joe, who has the nerve to expect people to appreciate his opinions on taste, when it comes from a guy who loves the taste of semen and male ass-crack?

I could ask, "Why is somebody who is literally cock-eyed, someone I can trust? This guy is in a 10% minority in the world, and was born with some mental quirk about thinking sucking another man's cock is wonderful. Isn't it possible he could be wrong about a show I want to see? He's not like me, that's for certain. So shouldn't be be fired and replaced with somebody with more Catholic tastes??"

No, live and let live, really.

Accept that some religious heterosexual baseball players are repelled by the idea of sucking another man's cock. This doesn't mean this person can't be praised for hitting six home runs in six games.

Examine the BIG QUOTE: "I disagree with the lifetyle, 100%." SO?

He didn't say he would beat up a fag. Or not play on the same team with one. He could've said "I disagree with the Muslim lifestyle 100%." Or "I disagree with the idea Mohammad is God, which is why I am Christian." As long as he's not advocating that Muslims be deported, or that they can't play baseball, what's so bad?

But a GAY guy who has a power position on a newspaper can get his way and tell the world that Murphy is a "zero" not a "hero" because he said he disapproved of guys sucking each others' cocks. Most straight men disapprove. Meaning, they don't want to see it. They don't want to do it. That makes them anti-gay? No, it doesn't.

I had a gay friend who was VERY VERY gay. He wrote and edited for gay newspapers and periodicals and was an activist. He also died of AIDS, which is as gay as you can get. He loved opera and David Bowie and Queen. He thought a vagina looked "like an industrial accident." Oh yeah...he also believed in NAMBLA. He told me he approved of grown men having sex with underage boys, because "boys want sex, but girls won't give it to them. So, let a man do it." You know, turn out the light, and who cares what gender is sucking your cock. Right?

Ah, no. But I didn't say "that's it, I'm not your friend." I allowed him his opinion. I thought, ok, he's gay and he sees things a bit differently. To my knowledge, he wasn't practicing what he preached. It was a theory. Something he just thought he'd voice. So? So somebody asked Murphy what he thinks about the gay lifestyle, and he said he "disagreed" with it. So? We can't all agree to disagree about things?

What if Murphy said he didn't like rap? That he didn't like the way rappers walk around dressing and talking? Should somebody use their clout with a newspaper to write an editorial whining "I can't appreciate Murphy hitting home runs because he doesn't embrace RAP and RAPPERS?" This Joe guy doesn't seem to realize that when it comes to discrimination, HE is the winner here. HE got to bitch and moan and get a forum for his views because anything GAY is BLOWN out of proportion.